3M EMI Copper Foil Shielding Tape 1182, 1 in x 18 yd (25.40 mm x 16.5
m)

3M EMI Copper Foil Shielding Tape 1182, 1 in x 18 yd (25.40 mm x 16.5 m)

Regular price
/

$800.99 USD & FREE Shipping.
  • Unique adhesive creates secure contact with the application surface
  • Suitable for bonding 2 surfaces together physically and electrically
  • Flame-retardant
  • Rated for 600V applications
  • UL Listed and RoHS 2011/65/EU Compliant
Overview
3M Copper Foil EMI Shielding Tape 1182 is a 3.5 mil thick acrylic adhesive shielding tape. This flame retardant tape is designed to bond 2 surfaces together physically and electrically. It comes on a removable liner for easy die cutting and handling. The tape is rated for 600V dry applications.3Mâ„¢ EMI Shielding Tape 1182 has deadsoft, copper foil backing with a pressure sensitive, electrically conductive, acrylic adhesive coating on both sides that ensures firm adherence. The conductive particles in the adhesive offer low resistance between the substrate and the backing. The construction of the tape offers a good method of bonding and grounding conductive surfaces. UL Listed and RoHS 2011/65/EU Compliant.

3M EMI Copper Foil Shielding Tape 1182, 1 in x 18 yd (25.40 mm x 16.5 m)

Specifications
General Information
Brand
3Mâ„¢
Adhesive Type
Acrylic
Country Of Origin
Taiwan
Sold As
Case
Lead Time
14 days
California Residents
Dimensions and Specifications
Backing (Carrier) Thickness (Imperial)
1.6 mil
Backing (Carrier) Thickness (Metric)
0.04 mm
Overall Length (Imperial)
18 yd
Overall Length (Metric)
16.5 m
Overall Width (Imperial)
1 in
Overall Width (Metric)
25.4 mm
Overall Length Imperial
18.0
Width
8.39 in
21.3 cm
Height
10.59 in
26.9 cm
Length
8.39 in
21.3 cm
Volume
744.75 cubic inch
12204.26 cm3
Weight
112 oz
3175.1 g
Material and Composition
Backing (Carrier) Material
Copper Foil, Flat
Backing Carrier Material
Copper Foil, Flat
Material
Copper Foil
Shelf Life
1825
Certifications and Standards
Specifications Met
UL Recognized
Resources
Datasheet
Why would you use this tool for ?
Reviews